Other statistical highlights

Annual Report

August 1, 2024 – July 31, 2025

Contact Centre activities

Our Contact Centre received more than 124,000 communications by telephone, in writing, and by online chat in 2024–25. This is a marginal increase of 0.2% from last year.

Table 11.1: Communications received
Type of communication 2024-25 Year-over-year change
Written correspondence* 67,235 +16%
Phone calls answered 54,075 -14%
Chat sessions answered 2,922 +2%
Total communications 124,232 +0.2%

* Written correspondence refers to communication received via email, postal mail, and the CCTS online complaint form.

Written correspondence increased for the second year in a row. This year we saw a 16% increase after an increase of 76% last year. For the first time, it became the most-used type of communication, replacing phone calls.

Out-of-mandate issues

Each year, some customer complaints raise issues that we are unable to accept because they fall outside our mandate. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) set our mandate and reviews it from time to time.

The scope of complaints that the CCTS is authorized to receive, along with examples of services and subjects that fall outside the scope of the CCTS, are set out in our Procedural Code. When we receive complaints that are outside our mandate, such as pricing, infrastructure, or privacy issues, we notify the customer and the provider. We then refer the customer to a more appropriate organization or complaint-handling body.

The tables below show the number of issues raised by customers that we could not accept because they were outside our mandate.

Procedural Code Section 3

Out-of-mandate issues have declined for six consecutive years, with a 30% decrease this year despite an increase in accepted complaints and issues. This steady downward trend may be due to the positive impact of ongoing improvements, such as complaint handling process and online customer complaint form enhancements.

Table 11.2: Procedural Code Section 3
Issue Number
Out-of-mandate telecom issues
Internet applications and content, s. 3.1(a)(i) 44
Infrastructure
s. 3.1(c)(vi) rights of way
s. 3.1(c)(vii) plant, poles, towers
s. 3.1(c)(iv) networking services
602
Customer equipment and wiring
s. 3.1(c)(i) customer-owned equipment
s. 3.1(c)(ii) inside wiring
259
Regulated services
s. 3.1(a)(ii) emergency services
s. 3.1(a)(iii) payphones
s. 3.1.(a)(vi) 900/976 calls
26
Telemarketing and unsolicited spam, s. 3.1.(a)(v) 180
Phone or internet scams 95
Other
s. 3.1(a)(iv) Yellow Pages or business directories
38
Out-of-mandate broadcasting issues
Content
s. 3.1(b)(i) digital media broadcasting undertaking services
s. 3.1(b)(ii) interactive TVSP services and applications
s. 3.1(b)(iii) broadcasting content
s. 3.1(b)(iv) journalistic ethics
s. 3.1(b)(vi) simultaneous substitution
62
TVSP not required to participate in CCTS 10
Other 20
Other out-of-mandate issues
False/misleading advertising, s. 3.1(c)(viii)  374
Aggressive tactics 239
Privacy issues, s. 3.1(c)(ix) 420
Pricing, s. 3.1(c)(v) 590
Security services, s. 3.1(c)(iii) 305
Total for all out-of-mandate issues* 3,264

* Some out-of-mandate issues are raised in complaints that also raise in-scope issues.

Procedural Code Section 4

Complaints about customer service, operating practices, or service provider policies do not fall within our mandate. However, we track the inquiries we get about these issues.

This year, we saw the fourth year in a row of decreases. There were 4,337 issues, representing a 15% decrease year-over-year.

Table 11.3: Procedural Code Section 4
Issue Number
Section 4.1 Customer service
Rude representative 327
Wait times 472
Other – Customer services 1,161
Total 1,960
Section 4.3 General operating practices and policies 2,377
Total issues 4,337

Procedural Code Section 10

Under our Procedural Code, we have a duty to decline complaints when:

  • The customer has not yet given the service provider a reasonable opportunity to resolve the issues (Section 10.1).
  • The same complaint had been or was being dealt with by another agency with authority to compensate the customer for loss (Section 10.2(b)).
  • The facts of the complaint relate to events that happened more than a year before the complaint was submitted (Section 10.3(a)).
  • The complaint is about issues that happened more than one year before the service provider joined the CCTS as a Participating Service Provider on or after September 1, 2017 (Section 10.3(b)).

While we must decline such complaints, we track and report on them.

In the past year, issues that fell under our duty to decline to take action increased by 35%, following a decrease of 83% last year. At the end of the fiscal year (July 2025), we added guidance to our complaint form to help customers understand that they must work with their service provider before submitting a complaint to the CCTS.

Table 11.4: Procedural Code Section 10
Issue Number
Section 10.1 PSP not offered the opportunity to resolve 226
Section 10.2(b) matter previously or currently with another agency 33
Section 10.3(a) facts transpired over one year ago 437
Section 10.3(b) facts arose one year prior to PSP joining the CCTS 2
Total issues 698

Out-of-mandate accessibility issues

Most issues about a service provider’s failure to accommodate a customer’s accessibility requests are outside of our mandate.

At the request of the CRTC and members of the accessibility community, we track when customers raise out-of-mandate accessibility issues about their service providers. We also refer these issues to the CRTC, which may have the authority to address them.

Table 11.5: Out-of-mandate accessibility issues

Issue Number
Customer Service – indifferent to customer’s disability 141
Accessibility-related accommodation issue (e.g. video relay services (VRS), message relay services (MRS), closed captioning, or described video not available; accessible handset not offered; store accessibility issues; refused to provide accessibility plan) 79
Policies and procedures (e.g. do not include accessibility information, or accessibility policy or practice not honoured) 104
Total out-of-mandate issues 324

The CRTC codes that we administer contain some accessibility-related requirements. These are within our mandate. The Wireless Code, Television Service Provider Code, and Internet Code require two kinds of accommodations:

  • an extended trial period for individuals with disabilities
  • contracts and related documents provided in an accessible format upon request

For more information, see Code of Conduct Reporting.

Analysis of closed complaints

This year, we closed 2,059 complaints. Most of these were due to uncooperative customers (59%), withdrawn complaints (19%), and duplicate complaints (15%). The following table breaks down the reasons for closing complaints and refers to the relevant sections of the Procedural Code.

Table 11.6: Complaints closed by reason for closure
Complaint Issues % of all closed complaints
Closed as duplicate 315 15.3%
Customer withdrew complaint 395 19.2%
Out-of-mandate after further information obtained 22 1.1%
Section 9.1(b) Customer is not authorized to file complaint 11 0.5%
Section 9.1(c) Complaint more appropriately handled by another agency 50 2.4%
Section 9.1(d) Further investigation not warranted 0 0.0%
Section 9.1(e) Customer not cooperative 1,215 59.0%
Section 10.1 Service provider not offered opportunity to resolve 5 0.2%
Section 10.2(b) Matter previously or currently with another agency 5 0.2%
Section 10.3(a) Complaint filed outside time limits 41 2.0%
Section 10.3(b) Facts arose one year prior to PSP joining the CCTS 0 0.0%
Total complaints 2,059 100%

We close complaints under section 9.1(e) of our Procedural Code when a customer does not cooperate with our efforts to process and investigate their complaints. For example, we may close a complaint if the customer does not provide information about their complaint, does not respond to our inquiries, or refuses to engage with their provider during the 20-day Initial Referral stage. We make multiple attempts to elicit customer cooperation before closing a complaint.

Small business customer complaints

Our mandate provides recourse for small business customers whose monthly bill for all telecommunications services is normally under $2,500.

For the second year in a row, we saw an increase in complaints from small business customers. In 2024–25, we concluded 2,136 complaints submitted by small business customers, an increase of 60% from the previous year. This represents 10% of all concluded complaints this year.

The were 4,326 issues reported within those 2,136 complaints. This is a 52% increase in issues from last year. Small business customer issues make up 10% of all issues, up from 7% last year.

When we report our operational statistics, we include the data for all the complaints we dealt with during the year. However, not all complaints are the same. Complaints from small business customers are often very different from those of individual consumers. The following tables highlight the differences.

Table 11.7: Small business complaint subjects vs. consumer complaint subjects
Issue category Small business customers Individual customers
Billing 43.3% 46.6%
Contract dispute 31.6% 24.3%
Service delivery 21.5% 25.0%
Credit management 3.4% 3.9%
In-mandate accessibility issues 0.1% 0.2%
Table 11.8: Small business complaint service types vs. consumer complaint service types
Service type Small business customers Individual customers
Wireless 59.7% 49.7%
Internet 23.6% 27.8%
Local phone 16.3% 6.6%
Long distance 0.3% 0.2%

 

  • Wireless issues remain the most raised by small business customers and are raised more frequently when compared to individual customers: 60% of issues raised by small business customers are about wireless services, up from 42% last year.
  • The proportion of small business internet issues decreased for the second year in a row and now accounts for 24% of small business issues, down from 33% last year.
  • Billing issues remain the most-raised issue, accounting for 43% of issues raised by small business customers, up from 38% last year.
Table 11.9: Top 10 small business complaint issues
Issue Small business customers Individual customers
Incorrect charge for monthly price plan 15.3% 13.7%
Disclosure issues 12.7% 9.6%
Credit or refund not received 8.8% 9.2%
Breach of contract 6.5% 5.3%
Regular price increase of monthly price plans 6.3% 6.8%
Termination fee 6.1% 3.1%
Quality of service 5.8% 8.4%
Changes to the contract 4.2% 5.5%
Complete loss of service 3.2% 3.9%
Third-party credit reporting 3.2% 3.7%

 

Compensation analysis

When complaints are resolved through the CCTS process, customers may receive compensation from their service provider. This compensation can take many forms, including:

  • bill credits
  • bill adjustments
  • free or discounted products and services
  • cash payments

At the Conciliation and Investigation stages, the CCTS may issue Investigation Findings that require providers to remedy the situation, including compensating the customer. At the Initial Referral stage, details of resolutions are often not shared with us, although some form of compensation might be part of the resolution reached directly between the customer and provider.

Based on the limited information available to us, total compensation awarded to customers through our process in 2024–25 was $4,243,774.

Table 11.10: Number of complaints in which compensation was awarded
Compensation range Number of complaints Percentage of compensation complaints
less than $100 4,259 32.8%
$100 – $499 6,708 51.7%
$500 – $999 1,251 9.6%
$1,000 – $4,999 704 5.4%
$5,000 or more 43 0.3%
Total 12,965 100%

Performance standards

Each year, we set a goal to provide great customer service, and we track our performance across various benchmarks. The following tables show how our performance this year compares to those benchmark targets.

We are pleased to have exceeded our performance targets for the contact centre and most complaint-handling standards this past year, despite a significantly increased volume of accepted complaints last year and a continued, though smaller, increase this year. We accepted over 95% of complaints within three business days, and we concluded 85% of complaints within 60 days.

This year, we enhanced the efficiency of our Conciliation stage, resulting in major improvements. We concluded 76% of complaints at this stage within 60 days from the time they were referred to Conciliation. We continue our efforts to improve the efficiency of the Investigation stage of our process. Only about 5% of complaints are concluded at Investigation.

Contact Centre

Table 11.11: Contact Centre performance standards
Process 2024‑25 Target
Answer phone calls within 120 seconds 84.6% 80%
Process written communications within five business days 98.5% 80%

Complaint handling

Table 11.12: Complaint handling performance standards
Process 2024‑25 Target
Assess complaints to determine if they meet eligibility criteria within three business days 95.3% 80%
Complaints concluded across all stages within 60 days 85.4% 80%
Complaints concluded at Initial Referral stage within 30 days of acceptance 89.9% 80%
Proportion of complaints concluded at Initial Referral stage – 78.5%
Complaints concluded at Conciliation stage within 60 days of referral to Conciliation 76.2% 80%
Proportion of complaints concluded at Conciliation stage – 16.4%
Complaints concluded at Investigation stage within 90 days of referral to Investigation 42.2% 80%
Proportion of complaints concluded at Investigation stage – 5.0%

Regional analysis

We receive complaints from customers across Canada. Here, we identify the number of accepted complaints by province and territory.

* Population estimates, quarterly (statcan.gc.ca)

Table 11.13: Complaints accepted by province/territory
Province Complaints Population*
Alberta 2,957 12.5% 4,980,659 12.0%
British Columbia 4,858 20.5% 5,719,961 13.8%
Manitoba 685 2.9% 1,507,330 3.6%
New Brunswick 424 1.8% 859,839 2.1%
Newfoundland and Labrador 173 0.7% 545,464 1.3%
Northwest Territories 7 0.0% 45,242 0.1%
Nova Scotia 387 1.6% 1,080,418 2.6%
Nunavut 5 0.0% 41,572 0.1%
Ontario 9,964 42.1% 16,176,977 38.9%
Prince Edward Island 61 0.3% 180,029 0.4%
Quebec 3,807 16.1% 9,110,616 21.9%
Saskatchewan 259 1.1% 1,253,569 3.0%
Yukon 60 0.3% 47,111 0.1%
Total 23,647 100% 41,548,787 100%

* Canada, Statistics Canada, Table 17-10-0009-01 (formerly, CANSIM 051-0005)